Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Whacked!
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,912×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jingle Balls
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 12,250×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Tundra's Fortune
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 12,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Whacked! vs Jingle Balls
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.07% against 96.10%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,912× and 12,250×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Whacked! does not publish a rating.
Whacked! vs Tundra's Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.07% against 96.04%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,912× and 12,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Whacked! does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Whacked! returns more in theory over the long run, while Tundra's Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
