Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
xWays Hoarder 2
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,920×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cowboy Coins
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth, Wild west
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.14% against 96.08% — xWays Hoarder 2 is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 25,920× against 30,000×, with Cowboy Coins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: xWays Hoarder 2 does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. xWays Hoarder 2 returns more in theory over the long run, while Cowboy Coins reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
