Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Nolimit City

Microgaming

Booongo

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.14% against 96.24% — Ne Zha: Triple Powers is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 11,030× against 10,000×, with xWays Hoarder xSplit® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: xWays Hoarder xSplit® does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ne Zha: Triple Powers returns more in theory over the long run, while xWays Hoarder xSplit® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: xWays Hoarder xSplit® does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)