Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Nolimit City

Play’n GO

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Nolimit City and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.14% against 96.12%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 11,030× and 10,240×.
Volatility cannot be compared: xWays Hoarder xSplit® does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.14% against 96.10%.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 11,030× against 12,250×, with Jingle Balls higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: xWays Hoarder xSplit® does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. xWays Hoarder xSplit® returns more in theory over the long run, while Jingle Balls reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)