Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Battleground Royale
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Treats of Terror II
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.20% — Battleground Royale is 0.55 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 20,000× against 15,000×, with Battleground Royale higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Battleground Royale does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
