Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Butterfly Blossom
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Scrooge
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Galactic Gems
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Butterfly Blossom vs Scrooge
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.74% against 96.74%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Butterfly Blossom does not publish a rating.
Butterfly Blossom vs Galactic Gems
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.74% against 96.74%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Butterfly Blossom does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
