Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

PG Soft

Booongo

Microgaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Sugar Teddy x1000 does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Burst does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.95% against 96.20% — Candy Burst is 0.75 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 15,000× against 10,000×, with Candy Burst higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Burst does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)