Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Candy Superwin
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Sugar Craze Bonanza™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.73% against 96.10% — Candy Superwin is 0.63 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Superwin does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
