Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Captain’s Bounty
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wild west
VS
Queen of Bounty
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wild west
VS
Bubble Pop
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 27,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Captain’s Bounty vs Queen of Bounty
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.15% against 96.74% — Queen of Bounty is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 30,000× against 50,000×, with Queen of Bounty higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Captain’s Bounty does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wild west.
Captain’s Bounty vs Bubble Pop
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Bubble Pop does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 30,000× against 27,000×, with Captain’s Bounty higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Captain’s Bounty does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
