Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

PG Soft

Play’n GO

Booongo

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Flying Pigs does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 2.9×: 72× against 25×, with Chicky Run higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Chicky Run does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Chicky Run does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)