Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Dragon's Treasure Quest
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Adventure
VS

Lucky Apple x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS

Dragon Shard
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Dragon's Treasure Quest vs Lucky Apple x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon's Treasure Quest does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Dragon's Treasure Quest vs Dragon Shard
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.76% against 96.77%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon's Treasure Quest does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



