Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Farmstead Fortune
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
VS
Lucky Clucks™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
VS
Lucky Piggy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.79%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Farmstead Fortune vs Lucky Clucks™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.76% against 96.19% — Farmstead Fortune is 0.57 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Farmstead Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Farmstead Fortune vs Lucky Piggy
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.76% against 96.79%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 20,000×, with Lucky Piggy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Farmstead Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
