Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Farmstead Fortune

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.76%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia, Animals
Free demo available →
VS

Lucky Piggy

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.79%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
20,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia, Animals
Free demo available →
VS

Lucky Penny Power Scatter

Booongo

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia, Animals
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Farmstead Fortune vs Lucky Piggy

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.76% against 96.79%.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 20,000×, with Lucky Piggy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Farmstead Fortune does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.

Farmstead Fortune vs Lucky Penny Power Scatter

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Penny Power Scatter does not publish one.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Farmstead Fortune does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)