Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fruity Candy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Sweets
VS
Mithai Madness 10000X
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Blood Diamond
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 14,780×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fruity Candy vs Mithai Madness 10000X
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.20% — Fruity Candy is 0.55 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fruity Candy does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fruity Candy returns more in theory over the long run, while Mithai Madness 10000X reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Fruity Candy vs Blood Diamond
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.14% — Fruity Candy is 0.61 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 10,000× against 14,780×, with Blood Diamond higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fruity Candy does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fruity Candy returns more in theory over the long run, while Blood Diamond reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
