Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Galaxy Miner
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.78%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS

Starstruck
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,635×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Galaxy Miner vs Starstruck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.78% against 96.19% — Galaxy Miner is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.1×: 5,000× against 1,635×, with Galaxy Miner higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Galaxy Miner does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Galaxy Miner vs Superstar Sevens
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Superstar Sevens does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Galaxy Miner does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




