Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Guardians of Ice & Fire
PG Soft
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ugliest Catch
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.11%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.70% against 96.11% — Guardians of Ice & Fire is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Guardians of Ice & Fire does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Guardians of Ice & Fire returns more in theory over the long run, while Ugliest Catch reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
