Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gemstones Gold
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 7,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Knockout Riches
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Golden Caravan
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Gemstones Gold vs Knockout Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.71% against 96.75%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 7,500× against 10,000×, with Knockout Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gemstones Gold does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Gemstones Gold vs Golden Caravan
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.71% against 96.19% — Gemstones Gold is 0.52 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 7,500× against 5,000×, with Gemstones Gold higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gemstones Gold does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
