Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Hawaiian Tiki
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ninja Raccoon Frenzy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.80%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Lucky Apple x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Hawaiian Tiki vs Ninja Raccoon Frenzy
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.76% against 96.80%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,500× and 2,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Hawaiian Tiki does not publish a rating.
Hawaiian Tiki vs Lucky Apple x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Hawaiian Tiki does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
