Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Heist Stakes
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.72%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Break Away Ultra
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS
Wild Bandito
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Heist Stakes vs Break Away Ultra
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.72% against 96.73%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Heist Stakes does not publish a rating.
Heist Stakes vs Wild Bandito
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.72% against 96.73%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 30,000× against 25,000×, with Heist Stakes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Heist Stakes does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Bandito returns more in theory over the long run, while Heist Stakes reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
