Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Legend of Perseus
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Raider Jane's Crypt of Fortune
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS

Lucky Apple x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Legend of Perseus vs Raider Jane's Crypt of Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.77% against 96.75%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Legend of Perseus does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Legend of Perseus returns more in theory over the long run, while Raider Jane's Crypt of Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Legend of Perseus vs Lucky Apple x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Legend of Perseus does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



