Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Legend of Perseus

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.77%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
50,000×
Reels
6
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Raider Jane's Crypt of Fortune

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.75%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
50,000×
Reels
6
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Lucky Apple x1000

Booongo

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Legend of Perseus vs Raider Jane's Crypt of Fortune

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.77% against 96.75%.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Legend of Perseus does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Legend of Perseus returns more in theory over the long run, while Raider Jane's Crypt of Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Legend of Perseus vs Lucky Apple x1000

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Legend of Perseus does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)