Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

PG Soft

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Bonanza Gold does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 4.7×: 100,000× against 21,175×, with Leprechaun Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Leprechaun Riches does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.35% against 96.83% — Leprechaun Riches is 0.52 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 33333.3×: 100,000× against 3×, with Leprechaun Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Leprechaun Riches does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)