Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Legendary Monkey King
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Buffalo Win
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.71% against 96.71%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 50,000× against 25,000×, with Legendary Monkey King higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Legendary Monkey King does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Buffalo Win returns more in theory over the long run, while Legendary Monkey King reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
