Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Lucky Piggy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.79%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
VS

Lucky Clucks™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
VS

Lucky Penny Power Scatter
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Piggy vs Lucky Clucks™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.79% against 96.19% — Lucky Piggy is 0.60 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lucky Piggy does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Lucky Piggy vs Lucky Penny Power Scatter
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Penny Power Scatter does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lucky Piggy does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



