Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mask Carnival
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Phoenix Rises
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Queen of Cairo
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Mask Carnival vs Phoenix Rises
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.70% against 96.70%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 20,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mask Carnival does not publish a rating.
Mask Carnival vs Queen of Cairo
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.70% against 96.59% — Mask Carnival is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 20,000× against 10,000×, with Mask Carnival higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mask Carnival does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
