Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

PG Soft

PG Soft

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.73% against 96.77%.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 5,000× against 7,500×, with Lucky Clover Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Midas Fortune does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.73% against 96.48% — Midas Fortune is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 6,015×, with Coins of Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Midas Fortune does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Midas Fortune returns more in theory over the long run, while Coins of Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)