Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Muay Thai Champion
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 97.38%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS
Treats of Terror II
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 97.38% against 96.20% — Muay Thai Champion is 1.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 15,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Muay Thai Champion does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Muay Thai Champion returns more in theory over the long run, while Treats of Terror II reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
