Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super Golf Drive
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Queen of Cairo
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.77% against 96.59% — Super Golf Drive is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 8,000× against 10,000×, with Queen of Cairo higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Super Golf Drive does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Super Golf Drive returns more in theory over the long run, while Queen of Cairo reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
