Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Supermarket Spree
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Death Dominion
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.54%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Buffalo Win
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Supermarket Spree vs Death Dominion
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.71% against 96.54% — Supermarket Spree is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 25,000× against 20,000×, with Supermarket Spree higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Supermarket Spree does not publish a rating.
Supermarket Spree vs Buffalo Win
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.71% against 96.71%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 25,000× and 25,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Supermarket Spree does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
