Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super Wildrix
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Battleground Royale
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Dead, Dead Or Deader
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 19,349×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Super Wildrix vs Battleground Royale
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.75% against 96.75%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 20,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Super Wildrix does not publish a rating.
Super Wildrix vs Dead, Dead Or Deader
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.09% — Super Wildrix is 0.66 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 19,349×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Super Wildrix does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
