Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Touchdown Wins
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS
Shaolin Soccer
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.93%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sports
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.74% against 96.93% — Shaolin Soccer is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 5,000× against 4,000×, with Touchdown Wins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Touchdown Wins does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Shaolin Soccer returns more in theory over the long run, while Touchdown Wins reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Sports.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
