Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Vampire's Charm
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS

Zombie Train
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS

Lucky Apple x1000
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Vampire's Charm vs Zombie Train
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Zombie Train does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 20,000× against 15,000×, with Vampire's Charm higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Vampire's Charm does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Vampire's Charm vs Lucky Apple x1000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Apple x1000 does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Vampire's Charm does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


