Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Ape #3258
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reactoonz 100
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.73% against 96.20% — Wild Ape #3258 is 0.53 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wild Ape #3258 does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Ape #3258 returns more in theory over the long run, while Reactoonz 100 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
