Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Zombie Blasters
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Deadwood xNudge®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 13,950×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Ghost of Dead
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Zombie Blasters vs Deadwood xNudge®
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.03% — Zombie Blasters is 0.72 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 10,000× against 13,950×, with Deadwood xNudge® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Zombie Blasters does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Zombie Blasters returns more in theory over the long run, while Deadwood xNudge® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Zombie Blasters vs Ghost of Dead
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.21% — Zombie Blasters is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Zombie Blasters does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Zombie Blasters returns more in theory over the long run, while Ghost of Dead reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
