Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

PG Soft

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.21% — Zombie Outbreak is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Ghost of Dead higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Zombie Outbreak does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Zombie Outbreak returns more in theory over the long run, while Ghost of Dead reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Horror.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Zombie Train does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 3.0×: 5,000× against 15,000×, with Zombie Train higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Zombie Outbreak does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Horror.

Add to the comparison (up to four)