Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
13th Trial Hercules Abyssways
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 60,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
Crabby's Gold II
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.22%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.22%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 60,000× against 30,000×, with 13th Trial Hercules Abyssways higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Crabby's Gold II returns more in theory over the long run, while 13th Trial Hercules Abyssways reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
