Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
24k Dragon
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 24,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
The Dragon Tiger
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 18,125×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.53% — The Dragon Tiger is 0.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 24,000× against 18,125×, with 24k Dragon higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Dragon Tiger returns more in theory over the long run, while 24k Dragon reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
