Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
3 Clown Monty
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.31% — Nitro Nights is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 20,000× against 15,000×, with 3 Clown Monty higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Nitro Nights does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Nitro Nights returns more in theory over the long run, while 3 Clown Monty reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
