Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
3 Clown Monty
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Nitro Nights
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.31%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Captain’s Bounty
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wild west
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
3 Clown Monty vs Nitro Nights
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.31% — Nitro Nights is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 20,000× against 15,000×, with 3 Clown Monty higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Nitro Nights does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Nitro Nights returns more in theory over the long run, while 3 Clown Monty reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
3 Clown Monty vs Captain’s Bounty
- Different format families: 3 Clown Monty is Fixed paylines, Captain’s Bounty is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.15% — 3 Clown Monty is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 20,000× against 30,000×, with Captain’s Bounty higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Captain’s Bounty does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. 3 Clown Monty returns more in theory over the long run, while Captain’s Bounty reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
