Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
5x Magic
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,250×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Magic Piggy OG
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy, Animals
VS
Wild Spells
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,450×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
5x Magic vs Magic Piggy OG
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.00% against 96.20% — Magic Piggy OG is 1.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 5,250× against 2,500×, with 5x Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while 5x Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
5x Magic vs Wild Spells
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.00% against 96.40% — Wild Spells is 1.40 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.6×: 5,250× against 1,450×, with 5x Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Spells returns more in theory over the long run, while 5x Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
