Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
5x Magic
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,250×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Irish Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,250×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Wild Spells
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,450×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
5x Magic vs Irish Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 95.00% against 95.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,250× and 5,250×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
5x Magic vs Wild Spells
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.00% against 96.40% — Wild Spells is 1.40 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.6×: 5,250× against 1,450×, with 5x Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Spells returns more in theory over the long run, while 5x Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
