Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

5x Magic

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
95.00%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
5,250×
Reels
3
Theme signals
Fantasy
Free demo available →
VS

Wild Spells

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.40%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
1,450×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy
Free demo available →
VS

Magic Piggy OG

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
2,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy, Animals

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

5x Magic vs Wild Spells

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 95.00% against 96.40% — Wild Spells is 1.40 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 3.6×: 5,250× against 1,450×, with 5x Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Spells returns more in theory over the long run, while 5x Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

5x Magic vs Magic Piggy OG

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 95.00% against 96.20% — Magic Piggy OG is 1.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 5,250× against 2,500×, with 5x Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while 5x Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)