Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.30% against 96.20% — 7 Sins is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.9×: 1,580× against 3,000×, with Canine Carnage higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. 7 Sins returns more in theory over the long run, while Canine Carnage reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.30% against 96.47% — Jade Butterfly is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 1,580× against 1,400×, with 7 Sins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jade Butterfly returns more in theory over the long run, while 7 Sins reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)