Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Ace of Spades

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
95.87%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
33×
Reels
33
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Crank It Up

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
95.95%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 95.87% against 95.95% — Crank It Up is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 303.0×: 33× against 10,000×, with Crank It Up higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)