Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Banana Rock
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.60%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 500
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Golden Colts
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 500
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Carnaval Fiesta
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Banana Rock vs Golden Colts
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.60% against 96.55%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,500× and 2,500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Banana Rock returns more in theory over the long run, while Golden Colts reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Banana Rock vs Carnaval Fiesta
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Carnaval Fiesta does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Music & party.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
