Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Banana Rock
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.60%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 500
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Harvest Moon - Grave Profits
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.60% against 96.50% — Banana Rock is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 4.0×: 2,500× against 10,000×, with Harvest Moon - Grave Profits higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Banana Rock returns more in theory over the long run, while Harvest Moon - Grave Profits reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Music & party.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
