Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Battle Royal
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rainforest Magic
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.54%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Wolf Gold Ultimate
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.57%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Battle Royal vs Rainforest Magic
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.56% against 96.54%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Battle Royal returns more in theory over the long run, while Rainforest Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Battle Royal vs Wolf Gold Ultimate
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.56% against 96.57%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
