Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.09% — Captain Glum: Pirate Hunter is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Adventure.

Different format families: Captain Glum: Pirate Hunter is Fixed paylines, Tombstone is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.19%.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 9,000× against 11,456×, with Tombstone higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Tombstone does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Captain Glum: Pirate Hunter returns more in theory over the long run, while Tombstone reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Adventure.

Add to the comparison (up to four)