Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Cat Wilde and the Incan Quest

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
High
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
Animals, Adventure
Free demo available →
VS

Temple Guardians

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.53%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals, Adventure
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.53% — Temple Guardians is 0.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Volatility labels differ: High against Very high. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
  • Shared theme signals: Animals, Adventure.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)