Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Chambers of Ancients
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.31%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Diamonds of the Realm
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.31% against 96.23% — Chambers of Ancients is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 20,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Chambers of Ancients returns more in theory over the long run, while Diamonds of the Realm reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
