Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
City of Sound
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.30%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Striking Hot 5
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.30% against 96.29%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 5,000×, with Striking Hot 5 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. City of Sound returns more in theory over the long run, while Striking Hot 5 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
